skip to main content
Austin City Connection logo; link back to Austin City Connection home page
 
Options

Directory | Departments | FAQ | Links | Site Map | Help | Contact Us

Publications

Barton Creek Report
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Disclaimer: This excerpt from the report is a draft and is subject to revision

Purpose

This report presents the Austin City Council, the Environmental Board, and the community at large a comprehensive account of the water quality investigations completed by the City's Environmental Resource Management staff and provides a "state of the creek" report for its most popular natural resource, the Barton Creek/Barton Springs system.

The studies described in this report attempt to diagnose the level of impact on Barton Creek's water quality from urbanization activities such as large scale land developments, wastewater disposal alternatives, golf course and residential landscape maintenance, and cattle ranching. The primary approach in most of the studies is to monitor ground water, surface water, sediments, and biology of Barton Creek and compare urban or developed sites with rural or undeveloped sites. The primary pollution impairments of concern include sedimentation, nutrient enrichment, bacterial contamination, and toxic substance contamination. These constituents are measured directly from the water and sediments, and their impact is measured using various ecological methods assessing the diversity and abundance of aquatic plant and animal communities. Elements of this report include both comprehensive narratives of previously unreleased studies as well as summaries of studies which have recently been released.

Directives

Espey Huston and Associates (EHA) provided a baseline of data on the Barton Creek watershed in 1979 with their Barton Creek Watershed Study, written for Austin's Department of Environmental Protection (EHA, 1979). They identified gaps in the ecological information and described studies needed for better understanding of Barton Creek, its protection, and management. EHA stated that the existing data base was not adequate to determine the effects of development. A resolution passed by the Austin City Council on October 15, 1987 directed the City's Department of Environmental Protection to assist the Environmental Board in a short term review and analysis of existing data on the Barton Creek watershed. The resulting 1988 City Manager's Barton Creek Policy Definition Report was endorsed by the Environmental Board, and the recommendation for Action Group III-2 was -- "continue to monitor and report upon changes in baseline conditions of land and water resources in the watershed which are attributable to urban development." Such is the essential focus of this report. Although this directive was made in 1988, funding, staff, equipment, and monitoring plans were not solidified until 1990, and monitoring for several study elements did not begin until 1992 or 1993. The following projects are documented in this report:

Report Element Overviews and Findings

  1. Barton Creek Watershed Ground Water Monitoring Program: 1993 - 1996

    Purpose:

    • Determine impact of urbanization on ground water quality and quantity for both baseflow and stormflow.
    • Determine impacts of on-site and wastewater irrigation on ground water quality and flow.
    • Identify characteristics of water quality and flow in Barton Springs and the Edwards Aquifer.

    Overview:

    Ground water monitoring in the Barton Creek watershed focuses on ground water issues in both the Contributing Zone and Recharge Zone of Barton Springs. Contributing Zone efforts examine local ground water resources and problems because of the nature of the shallow water tables in the Contributing Zone. Recharge Zone or Edwards Aquifer studies are more area-wide in scale due to the complex nature of ground water recharge and movement in the Edwards Aquifer and the associated difficulty of identifying local development impacts. Current ground water monitoring efforts related to Barton Creek include:

    • Water samples are collected and analyzed for nutrients, physical parameters, ions, and selected heavy metals from selected springs in the Barton Creek watershed two times a year.
    • Water samples are collected quarterly from five springs discharging from the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer (Barton, Eliza, Old Mill, Backdoor, and Cold Springs) and analyzed for physical parameters, nutrients, ions, and selected heavy metals.
    • Water samples are collected every two weeks from Barton Springs and analyzed for nutrients and total suspended solids.
    • Ground water flow paths are identified in the Edwards Aquifer from specific points in Barton and Williamson Creeks through an interlocal agreement with BS/EACD.
    • In situ data recorders are used continuously in Barton Springs measuring water pH, temperature, dissolved oxygen, specific conductance, turbidity, and depth. Data recorders are used periodically in other Edwards springs.
    • Through a cooperative program with the U.S. Geological Survey, water samples are collected annually from numerous wells in the Barton Springs segment and Barton Springs.

    Findings:

    Ground water quality is generally good in springs monitored in the Glen Rose Formation and in the Contributing Zone of the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer. However, statistically significant water quality differences in total dissolved solids, total Kjeldahl nitrogen, calcium, potassium, nitrate, sodium, chloride, sulfate, alkalinity, and total organic carbon have been identified in springs located in urban areas versus rural areas. One spring on the mainstem of Barton Creek, below the Lost Creek Blvd. bridge, has a significant effect on the nitrate concentrations in a localized area of the mainstem of Barton Creek. The only identifiable source of the nitrates is leakage from effluent holding ponds and effluent irrigation in the immediate area. Evidence of this source is similar nitrogen concentrations and isotope ratios at the holding pond and spring. Increases in springflow resulting from wastewater irrigation on a tributary in Barton Creek West have also been indicated from monitoring data.

    Barton Springs water remains relatively unchanged by urban activities since monitoring was initiated. Nutrient and metal concentrations do not show clear time trends that appear related to urban development. However, the presence of tetrachloroethylene in Barton Springs water in the late 1980's and early 1990's indicates that the results of some urban activities can be seen in the springs. Several heavy metals, including arsenic, cadmium, copper, lead, nickel, and zinc, as well as sediment of possible anthropogenic origin also have been detected at Barton Springs. Old Mill and Cold Springs also appear to be affected by urbanization as indicated by heavy metals, pesticides, and total petroleum hydrocarbons. Comparisons of ground water chemistry made among five discrete spring sources (Barton, Backdoor, Eliza, Old Mill, and Cold) within the Barton Springs segment of the Edwards Aquifer show that Barton Springs and Backdoor Springs have the highest nitrate levels. These and other water quality differences among the five springs are commonly attributed to differences in recharge areas, land use, and flow paths to each spring. Barton, Eliza, and Old Mill Springs discharge into Barton Creek near its confluence with the Colorado River. They appear to discharge water recharged throughout the Edwards Aquifer. Cold Springs discharges into the Colorado River downstream of Red Bud Isle and receives water recharged in the Rollingwood area and Barton Creek. Backdoor Spring discharges to Barton Creek in the upper end of the Recharge Zone and appears to receive water recharged between Barton Creek and U.S. Hwy 290.

    Many constituents like nitrate and various ion concentrations are inversely related to discharge rates at Barton Springs due to dilution with less concentrated recharge water, while suspended solids and bacteria concentrations are directly related to discharge rates due to contributions from surface runoff. Impacts to Barton Springs from rainfall in the Barton Creek watershed generally have a lag time of approximately 14 hours, indicated by declining values in specific conductance and pH, and increases in turbidity and dissolved oxygen. Based on this lag time, ground water velocity of recharged storm water is estimated to average around 860 ft/hr. A data point indicating possible recharge from Williamson Creek reaching Barton Springs in sixty-five hours indicates ground water average velocity for storm water of approximately 400 ft/hr.. Analysis of Edwards wells indicates that seven wells, in addition to Old Mill Spring, may be affected by urban development, based on nitrate, sulfate, and chloride concentrations. These sites are all in developed areas of the Aquifer. Barton Springs water quality is representative of the overall good quality of water recharging the Edwards Aquifer. Nevertheless, transient impacts to Barton Springs are affected most strongly by water quality changes in Barton Creek as shown by Datasonde parameter changes in water quality at Barton Springs following stormwater runoff to the creek.

  2. The Barton Creek Pools Study: November 1990 - November 1995

    Purpose:

    The Barton Creek Pools Study was initiated to document existing ecological or water quality impacts to perennial pools due to current levels of development. The study is a comparison of baseflow water quality and an ecological assessment of nine pools along the mainstem of Barton Creek from the headwaters to the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone. Analyses of data are made to determine if statistically significant differences exist between pools for various water chemistry parameters and percent cover of filamentous algae, and determine if any trends in water quality degradation exist between developed and undeveloped reaches of the creek or if any water quality degradation is measurable over time.

    Overview:

    Since November of 1990, the City of Austin has monitored baseflow water chemistry and percent cover filamentous algae growth at nine natural pool sites on the mainstem of Barton Creek, from the headwaters, upstream of Dripping Springs, to the Edwards Aquifer Recharge Zone, upstream of the Loop 360 bridge in Austin.

    Aquatic vegetative cover, nutrients, suspended and dissolved solids, bacteria, and additional chemical and physical parameters were measured quarterly in each of the nine pools.

    Findings:

    Comparisons made between pools in this study illustrate some small but statistically significant spatial differences in water quality along Barton Creek's mainstem; however, no temporal trends over the monitoring period were determined to be significant.

    Surface water comparisons made among nine perennial pools over a five year period on the mainstem of Barton Creek indicate that the lower three study pools, all below Barton Creek Blvd. and along the most highly developed reach, are each impacted by either significantly higher nitrates, TDS, TSS, turbidity or algal growth. The other six pools upstream of Barton Creek Blvd. show no significant degradation with the exception of significantly higher fecal coliform at the most upstream headwater pool. It is important to note that impacts to each of the lower three pools are localized and not ubiquitous along this lower reach of the creek. Water quality impacts seen at one study pool are remediated before reaching the next study pool, only to be replaced by other impacts related to local land use or construction activities.

    Baseflow water quality above Barton Creek Blvd. is fairly homogeneous, and from the data available the water chemistry along this reach of the mainstem has not deteriorated substantially since the 1988 Barton Creek Policy Definition Report was written. The baseflow water chemistry throughout the study area is still excellent compared to other urban streams contributing to Town Lake studied by the City's Water Watchdog Program and to least-disturbed streams studied by TNRCC in the Central Texas Plateau ecoregion.

    The highest nitrogen and TDS concentrations are found in one pool located below Lost Creek Blvd. Bridge. This elevated nitrogen and TDS is a result of contributions from a spring, possibly enriched through leaks in effluent holding ponds and effluent irrigation in the area. Similar stable nitrogen isotope ratios and nitrogen concentrations link the spring and effluent, but continued investigations, including dye tracing, would be necessary to verify effluent as a source.

    The pool below Lost Creek Blvd., downstream of residential and golf course land uses, is significantly higher than all other sites in percent cover of filamentous green algae, principally due to reoccurring Cladophora sp. blooms there. Higher nitrates and conductivity correlate positively with higher filamentous algae at this site,. ERM staff have also observed that massive Cladophora blooms can result from nutrient surges caused by accidental spills or mismanagement of domestic wastewater effluent used for irrigation.

    Significantly high turbidity is measured at two sites, one just below Barton Creek Blvd. and one just above the Recharge Zone. The Recharge Zone site is also significantly higher in TSS. Intense local construction activity and upstream impoundments which trap and concentrate the fine sediments from construction sites are the only unique observable source for these elevated TSS concentrations. In general, higher TSS values were caused by an increase in mineral sediment load rather than organic sediment load as observed through VSS to TSS ratios.

    Fecal coliform is significantly higher at the most upstream rural site (Pool 1); however, bacteria counts are still very low there compared to other urban creeks and normally within safe limits for recreational contact. Fecal coliform is of an animal, not human, origin throughout the watershed (as indicated by coliform/streptococcus ratios), including this site, where the source is most likely the cattle ranching operations upstream and adjacent to the sampling pool.

    At present, these significant water chemistry differences are rather small and localized. During periods of good flow, enough pristine waters are still contributed from Barton Creek's rural and undeveloped areas to dilute or remediate impacted discharges from developed tributaries and springs located lower in the watershed. As Barton's watershed develops and more impacted discharges are added, water quality degradation in Barton Creek will likely be more widespread and conspicuous.

    Further development in the Barton Creek watershed will most likely be associated with the following impacts observed in the pool study sites during baseflow periods: (1) diminished water clarity in impounded and slower-moving waters, resulting from cumulative impacts of construction-related runoff; (2) replacement of a relatively diverse aquatic flora with a monoculture of Cladophora algae below lands where there is potential for mismanagement of treated sewage effluent used for irrigation; (3) maintenance of heavier filamentous algae cover in the mainstem owing to nutrient-enriched waters draining to Barton Creek from developed tributaries and springs.

  3. Barton Creek Canyons Study: 1993 - 1995

    Purpose:

    The Canyons Study was initiated to compare water quality impacts to tributaries of Barton Creek from different land uses and methods of wastewater disposal in their contributing watersheds.

    Overview:

    Data was collected from 38 sites on tributaries to Barton Creek. Three tributaries representative of each major land use are monitored monthly for baseflow. Tributaries were categorized according to the dominant land use in their drainage area: golf course, high density residential, or rural (ranching and low density residential). Tributaries were further characterized according to the predominant method of wastewater disposal used in their drainage areas: golf courses using treated wastewater effluent for irrigation, residential areas irrigating with wastewater effluent on native land, residential areas on septic systems, residential areas on central sewage systems and rural areas with little or no commercial or residential development.

    Parameters measured in the laboratory included nutrients, bacteria, and physical parameters.

    Findings:

    There are significant differences in baseflow nitrate, ammonia, TDS, TSS, and turbidity concentrations between watersheds draining golf courses, residential, and rural land uses. Under most analysis groupings, golf course tributaries have higher constituent concentrations than residential tributaries, and both golf course and residential tributaries have substantially higher concentrations for these five parameters than rural tributaries.

    Baseflow data, as indicated by antecedent dry conditions, suggest that nitrate nitrogen is the most variable parameter measured in the Barton Creek watershed. A comparison of tributaries characterized by various wastewater treatment strategies reveal that golf course watersheds using sewage effluent irrigation and fully developed residential watersheds on central wastewater systems generate significantly higher nitrate concentrations in their baseflow than residential watersheds irrigating native grass areas with sewage effluent, residential neighborhoods on septic systems, or undeveloped rural watersheds.

    Buffers associated with residential areas using septic systems appear to be functioning to keep excess nutrients and bacteria from reaching surface waters. This finding may also be related to the lower impervious cover associated with larger lot sizes in residential areas on septic systems.

    When water samples are collected simultaneously during storm events from the three selected tributaries representing residential, golf, and rural land use, the representative golf course site is significantly higher in nitrates and ortho phosphorus, while the representative residential site is significantly higher in pH and lower in TDS. The residential site's lower TDS illustrates the effect of heavier storm runoff experienced in land uses with more impervious cover.

    Baseflow water quality samples collected contemporaneously from two adjacent residential canyons on central wastewater collection systems indicate that the size of the undeveloped buffer zone around a stream may be related to water quality. Median nitrate concentrations in these two canyons indicate that water quality improves as buffer zone size increases. Furthermore, impacts to pH are mitigated by larger buffer zones.

    In summary, when compared to streams representing rural land use, various parameters indicate statistically significant water quality degradation for streams representing golf or residential land use categories.

  4. Barton Creek Sediment Quality Studies: 1991 - 1995

    Purpose:

    Barton Creek sediment quality was assessed from a composite of various studies and investigations made by Austin's Environmental Resource Management staff to examine trends and compare contaminant levels to regulatory criteria.

    Overview:

    Sediment samples were gathered by five different project teams, each attempting to detect short and long term trends in the accumulation of heavy metals, organic pesticides and other organic constituents.

    Findings:

    Concentrations of sediment constituents throughout the Barton Creek watershed are not at levels of concern with the exception of the area in and around Barton Springs. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons were detected at levels which may have biological effects in the Barton Springs area. Although many potential pesticides were analyzed for, very few were found in detectable concentrations. However, one sample, immediately above Barton Springs, contained several organochlorine pesticides above the TNRCC 85th percentile, which is a regulatory screening level used in assessing sediment contaminants. Observed copper, lead, and zinc concentrations are elevated in the Barton Springs area relative to upstream sites; however, the highest chromium, cadmium, and zinc concentrations occurred in one sample taken at an upstream rural site. Grain size distribution indicates that higher concentrations of constituents at downstream sites could be attributed to the deposition of a larger percentage of fine-grain material.

  5. Bioassessment Strategies for Nonpoint Source Polluted Creeks, Grant Funded Project: June 1993 - August 1996

    Purpose:

    The major goals and objectives of the study included investigation and documentation of current levels of physical and biological impairment in two watersheds (Barton and Onion Creeks) with varying degrees of development, correlation of various biological community conditions with physical and chemical indicators of nonpoint source pollution, and development of effective long-term biological monitoring and assessment techniques for the Central Texas region.

    Overview:

    Aquatic biological communities are typically sensitive to water quality and habitat degradation. "Bioassessment" methodologies have been developed and are now widely used which analyze these communities for use as indicators of stream health. For the purposes of this study, "benthic macroinvertebrates" an aquatic assemblage of snails, mayflies, stoneflies, blackflies, caddisflies, dragonflies, etc., were examined as well as a community of periphytic algae, the diatoms.

    Following initial protocol development, project staff cataloged potential study sites by identifying reaches with appropriate habitat and substrate for benthic communities. After site selection, water quality, habitat, and biological data were collected at Barton and Onion Creek study sites on a quarterly basis for three years. Biological data were analyzed with corresponding water chemistry and land use attributes in order to document the relationship between the data sets.

    Findings:

    Development in Barton Creek is still in the early stages, with current impervious cover estimates in the bioassessment study reach at 6 percent. Onion Creek has impervious cover estimates of 10 percent in the study reach. The findings of this report suggest that the macroinvertebrate community is responding more dramatically to the water quality variation on Onion than on Barton Creek. It is likely that creeks with higher mean levels of water column nutrients than Barton may have a more consistent response to chemistry by the macroinvertebrate community.

    Overall, the diatom community metrics are better than the benthic macroinvertebrate metrics at differentiating between different water chemistries and land uses. Consistent site level variation is more common in Onion Creek than in Barton Creek, suggesting that there is a minimum level of chemical constituent concentrations beneath which these biological metrics cannot effectively differentiate.

    On both Barton and Onion creeks, diatom community changes are related distinctly to watershed changes due to levels of development as indicated by land use breakdown. On Barton Creek the diatom community is significantly responding to the land use change from undeveloped to golf course and residential land uses which begin downstream of Barton Creek Blvd. and continue down to Lost Creek Blvd.

    From data collected in this study, the chlorophyll a mean concentrations are different between the land use groups on Barton Creek. Sites adjacent to and downstream of Barton Creek Blvd. with higher levels of residential housing and golf course land use had significantly higher chlorophyll a and pheophytin values than sites with lower levels of each of these land uses. However, the relationship of chlorophyll a and its surrogates to water chemistry data was not significant, suggesting that the measure of algal biomass through chlorophyll a is a more sensitive indicator of nutrient enrichment from non-point source pollution than routine chemical water quality sampling.

    The radical fluctuation in flow rates during this study emphasized temporal variation in water chemistry concentrations and minimized the influence of spatial, or land use, differences between sites. Nonetheless, consistent relationships were identified between developed land use and two important water chemistry parameters. - Total Dissolved Solids and Nitrate-Nitrite Nitrogen.

    Although overall nutrient concentrations on Barton Creek were not significantly different from upstream to downstream due to high standard deviations, all of the highest values and highest means were recorded between Barton Creek Blvd. and Lost Creek Blvd. In general, the macroinvertebrate data from the Bioassessment Grant indicate that current levels of biological impairment in Barton Creek are extremely low.

PART 2 of the Barton Creek Report Executive Summary

Report Publication Date: April 1997, 460 pages.


Return to Publications

Watershed Protection Home


Official Seal of the City of Austin
Austin City Connection - The Official Web site of the City of Austin
Contact Us: Send Email or 512-974-2550.
Legal Notices | Privacy Statement
© 1995 City of Austin, Texas. All Rights Reserved.
P.O. Box 1088, Austin, TX 78767 (512) 974-2000